---

Oracle’s Parabolic Surge: Smart AI Bet or Risky Bubble Echo?

Key Takeaways

• Oracle stock surged 31.5% in a single month, adding nearly $100 billion in market cap in days after its blockbuster earnings report.
• Rothschild & Co. Redburn initiated a sell rating with a $175 target price, far below the current ~$300 level.
• Oracle now trades at a 41x forward earnings multiple, well above its historical average of 19x, though it could fall toward 26x by 2028 if earnings materialize.
• The market may be overestimating the value of Oracle’s cloud contracts, with analysts suggesting only ~$60 billion in real value from its five-year Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) revenue guide.
• AI-driven demand, OpenAI contracts, and the Nvidia partnership provide upside — but history shows parabolic moves often correct sharply.

---

The Setup: Oracle in the Spotlight

For decades, Oracle was considered a slow-moving legacy database giant. Yet in 2025, it’s suddenly trading like a Silicon Valley high flyer. Following its September earnings report, Oracle stock went parabolic, shooting up more than 31% in a single month and adding over $100 billion in market cap almost overnight.

That kind of move naturally draws attention. Analysts, fund managers, and even hedge fund titans like Ken Griffin are weighing in. Some see echoes of the dot-com bubble, others see a genuine re-rating driven by real cloud and AI growth.

So, is Oracle the next heavyweight contender in AI infrastructure — or a middleweight stock punching above its class, destined for a pullback?

---

The Bear Case: Rothschild & Redburn’s Call

Rothschild & Co.’s Redburn unit threw cold water on Oracle bulls by initiating a sell rating with a $175 price target, nearly 40% below where the stock trades today. Their reasoning is stark:

• The market “materially overestimates the value of Oracle’s contracted cloud revenues.”
• OCI’s five-year revenue guidance, they estimate, only supports about $60 billion in value, far short of the blue-sky assumptions investors are baking in.
• With Oracle’s valuation stretched to 41x forward earnings, they believe the stock is pricing in a scenario unlikely to materialize.

In other words, today’s Oracle rally looks less like sustainable growth and more like speculative froth.

---

The Bull Case: AI Tailwinds and Real Earnings

Not all agree with Redburn’s bearish stance. Bill Baruch, who owns Oracle but recently trimmed his position, emphasizes that the stock is undergoing a repricing, not just a speculative pump.

• Oracle is expanding into new “muscles” — cloud, AI, and enterprise partnerships — that justify higher multiples than its legacy business.
• The company recently signed a deal with Nvidia, a clear signal that OpenAI and other hyperscale customers will be routing workloads through Oracle Cloud.
• Unlike the late 1990s tech bubble, today’s AI leaders are posting real earnings growth. For context, Cisco’s P/E in 1998 was 30x and shot to 120x by 2000 — without earnings to back it. Oracle’s multiple is elevated, but earnings are catching up.

In short, bulls argue that while volatility is inevitable, the long-term AI buildout — from cloud infrastructure to enterprise AI deployments — justifies staying in the trade.

---

Valuation Math: Lofty But Not Insane?

Let’s dig into the valuation trajectory.

• Today: 41x forward earnings (based on May 2025 year-end).
• By 2027: multiple could fall to 36x, assuming earnings grow as projected.
• By 2028: it drops further to ~26x, closer to high-growth peers.

If Oracle delivers on AI and cloud revenue, today’s $300 stock price may not be as outrageous as it looks. If contracts underdeliver, however, the downside could be severe.

---

Lessons From Market History

The temptation to draw parallels to 1999–2000 is understandable. But is it accurate?

• Dot-com bubble: valuations soared without earnings; Cisco hit 120x P/E.
• 2021 SPAC boom: pre-revenue companies gained $30–50 billion valuations overnight.
• Today: Oracle, Nvidia, Microsoft are expensive, yes — but with real revenue streams and demand.

The more valid bubble warning signs may lie in quantum computing startups and niche AI names that trade on hype rather than fundamentals. Those are the true echoes of 1999. Oracle may simply be caught in the crossfire of bubble chatter.

---

Portfolio Strategy: Trim or Hold?

Bill Baruch’s decision to trim but not sell Oracle reflects a pragmatic approach:

1. Take profits after parabolic gains to rebalance risk.
2. Recognize that Oracle is now a higher-volatility stock — no longer the “safe” legacy tech play.
3. Maintain exposure to AI-driven upside, but size the position smaller to absorb inevitable swings.

For long-term investors, this is a lesson in discipline. Even great companies can overshoot in the short term. Trimming at extremes doesn’t mean losing conviction — it means risk management.

---

The Bigger Picture: AI Buildout Fuels Growth

One reason Oracle surged is broader macro context:

• GDP revisions show strength in nonresidential fixed investment — meaning corporate America is plowing money into cloud, energy, and data infrastructure.
• AI buildouts require massive cloud capacity and Oracle has positioned itself as a secondary player alongside Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS, with differentiated advantages in enterprise databases.
• The Nvidia partnership ensures Oracle’s infrastructure is directly plugged into the hottest AI workloads.

This isn’t just hype — it’s capital expenditure dollars hitting balance sheets.

---

Beyond Oracle: Palantir’s Streak

Oracle isn’t the only name flashing bubble-like momentum. Palantir (PLTR) is on track for its seventh straight quarter of double-digit gains, something only Amazon managed in 1999.

• Palantir trades at a 234x multiple, far richer than Oracle.
• Bulls argue government and enterprise AI contracts will support future growth.
• Skeptics see it as another case of sentiment running ahead of fundamentals.

Here again, the key is portfolio sizing — small but strategic allocations can capture upside without risking too much capital.

---

Conclusion: Parabolic Moves Demand Prudence

Oracle’s September run-up has all the hallmarks of parabolic price action:

• Vertical chart moves.
• Breathless analyst upgrades.
• A wave of investors rushing in.

History suggests such moves rarely end smoothly. Yet dismissing Oracle as a bubble ignores the real AI demand and contracts flowing into its cloud platform.

The truth is likely in the middle: Oracle is neither Cisco 1999 nor a risk-free cloud leader. It’s a maturing tech giant finding new life in AI — but priced for perfection.

Investor Takeaways

• Trim, don’t panic sell. Take profits, rebalance, but keep exposure to AI growth.
• Watch earnings closely. The multiple will compress naturally if revenue delivers.
• Avoid bubble-chasing. Distinguish between profitable AI leaders and speculative “pre-revenue” plays.
• Prepare for volatility. Stocks that jump 31% in a month can just as easily fall 20% in weeks.

The AI era is here. Oracle’s role in it may be lasting. But as every experienced investor knows: when stocks go parabolic, discipline matters more than ever.

---

Navigating AI Hype: Oracle’s Valuation Tug-of-War and Palantir’s Unstoppable Streak

In the electrifying arena of AI-driven markets, where fortunes flip faster than a neural network processes data, a recent analyst showdown has investors grappling with a timeless question: Is the froth building to a bubble, or is this the dawn of a new earnings-backed era? Picture this: Oracle (ORCL), the enterprise software giant pivoting hard into cloud infrastructure, faces a stark “Sell” initiation from Rothschild & Co. with a $175 price target—while its shares hover around $292. Meanwhile, Palantir (PLTR), the data analytics powerhouse, is barreling toward its seventh consecutive quarter of double-digit stock gains, rivaling only Amazon’s streak from the late ’90s. This isn’t just stock chatter; it’s a microcosm of the AI investment landscape, blending explosive growth narratives with valuation red flags.

As a data analyst and storyteller, I’ve sifted through the transcripts, earnings guides, and market metrics to unpack this drama. Drawing from real-time financial data and historical precedents, we’ll explore Oracle’s cloud ambitions under fire, the wisdom (or folly) of trimming positions amid parabolic runs, echoes of the .com bubble, and why Palantir remains a heavyweight contender. For business leaders eyeing AI allocations and policymakers shaping tech regulations, the takeaways are clear: Growth is real, but gravity pulls hard on overextended multiples. Let’s dive in.

Oracle’s Cloud Mirage: Overhyped Revenues or Underpriced Potential?

At the heart of the debate is Oracle’s Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) business, which has propelled the stock to an 87% year-to-date surge in 2025. The company’s fiscal year 2025 total revenues hit $57.4 billion, up 8% year-over-year, with cloud services and license support driving much of the momentum. Looking ahead, Oracle’s guidance paints a bullish picture: OCI revenues are projected to balloon 77% to $18 billion in fiscal 2026, scaling to $32 billion in 2027, $73 billion in 2028, and $114 billion in 2029. This trajectory positions cloud as 85% of revenues by fiscal 2031, a stark evolution from its legacy database roots.

Yet, Rothschild’s note cuts through the optimism like a debugger in buggy code. Analysts argue the market “materially overestimates” OCI’s contracted cloud revenues, valuing the five-year guide at a mere $60 billion—far below the implied premium baked into the current $292 share price. At a forward P/E of 41x (versus a historical average of 19x), Oracle trades at a premium that assumes flawless execution in a hyper-competitive cloud arena dominated by AWS and Azure. The stock’s May fiscal year-end means this multiple compresses to 36x for May 2027 earnings and 26x by May 2028, but only if AI-fueled deals like the rumored OpenAI partnership materialize. Skeptics point to the Nvidia-OpenAI dynamics as a funding wildcard, potentially squeezing Oracle’s upside.

Bill Baruch, a seasoned trader featured in the discussion, echoes this caution. Owning the stock but trimming his position, Baruch cites taxable gains, heightened volatility, and the need for cash to navigate “higher volatility” as the company “grows into new muscles.” It’s a pragmatic move: Oracle’s shares rocketed 31.5% in September alone, adding over $100 billion in market cap in mere days post-earnings—a parabolic spike reminiscent of momentum-fueled manias. From April lows, the stock doubled before the report, then doubled again in a week, leaving even bulls stunned.

To contextualize, consider this table comparing Oracle’s current valuation to historical norms and a .com-era peer:

Metric	Oracle (Current, Sep 2025)	Oracle (Historical Avg.)	Cisco (1998)
Forward P/E Ratio	41x	19x	~30x
Price/Sales (TTM)	14.22x	N/A	N/A
YTD Stock Return (2025)	87%	N/A	N/A
Market Cap	~$876B	N/A	N/A

This snapshot reveals Oracle’s stretched valuations, but also its growth premium. Cisco’s P/E hovered around 30x in 1998 before exploding to 120x by 2000 amid the bubble—yet earnings backed much of the early run. Oracle’s story feels similar: Real AI tailwinds from nonresidential spending and energy buildouts are revising GDP data higher, per recent reports. Still, at these levels, any execution hiccup could trigger a pullback.

This chart illustrates the divergent paths: Oracle’s steady climb accelerating in summer on earnings euphoria, versus Palantir’s relentless ascent, underscoring their shared AI momentum but differing risk profiles.

Trimming the Fat: Volatility in a Repriced Giant

Baruch’s trim isn’t a full exit—it’s balance. With the stock at 41x forward earnings, Oracle is repricing for unproven “blue sky” scenarios. The discussion highlights how AI growth has “punched above its weight class,” but revised GDP data shows broader economic tailwinds from infrastructure spend. Trimming allows watching “a few rounds” without overexposure, especially as volatility spikes. Josh Brown notes the post-earnings jolt: From April lows, Oracle added 100 points pre-report, then another 100 in days—pure momentum, untethered to fundamentals at times.

For portfolio managers, this is a lesson in position sizing. Great stocks (or even bad ones) go parabolic, but sustainability demands discipline. Baruch’s 1.75% allocation to similar high-flyers like Palantir exemplifies this: Size for the swings, but don’t bet the farm.

Bubble Whispers or Earnings Echoes? Decoding the .com Parallels

Enter Ken Griffin of Citadel, whose offhand remark about “.com bubble echoes” ripples through the transcript. Oracle’s $100 billion cap add in minutes evokes 1999 frenzy, but panelists push back. Joe Terranova argues we’re “not there yet”—Cisco’s 30x P/E in 1998 ballooned to 120x on earnings growth, not vaporware. Unlike the dot-com era, where valuations detached from profits, today’s mega-caps like Oracle and Nvidia boast real revenue ramps. Earnings, not hype, are the ballast.

That said, bubbles aren’t monolithic. The real froth brews in peripherals: Quantum computing names like IonQ and Rigetti, or nuclear plays, trading on $30-50 billion caps with scant revenues. Jonathan Krinsky’s call for “downside reversion” in high-volatility stocks aligns here—these are the 2025 SPACs, echoing 2021’s pre-revenue IPO boom. Griffin likely eyes volume spikes in unheard-of firms, not Oracle’s contracted deals. As Scott Nations quips, “What if it’s 1997?”—early innings, not endgame.

The fallacy? Forcing .com comparisons ignores context. 1999’s bubble burst on absent earnings; 2025’s AI wave rides actual growth. Oracle’s multiples may compress, but OpenAI windfalls could justify them. Policy watchers: Regulate the edges (e.g., speculative quantum funding), not the core infrastructure plays.

Palantir’s Heavyweight Hold: Fast-Tracking into the Future

Shifting gears to Palantir, the transcript crowns it a “long-term holding” despite a nosebleed 234x multiple. On track for its seventh straight quarter of double-digit gains—matched only by Amazon since 1999—PLTR has surged 135% year-to-date to $179 per share. Baruch bought in at $80 in April/May, sticking with a 1.75% position for its “fast-track” appeal: Governments and enterprises hire Palantir to accelerate AI deployments.

Q2 2025 earnings crushed: U.S. commercial revenue up 93% year-over-year to $733 million, total revenue +48% to over $1 billion. Sales growth has accelerated for eight quarters straight, with profits jumping 78%. At 208x forward P/E, it’s not cheap, but Baruch shrugs: “We’re not in this name because of the multiple.” New contracts and earnings catch-up justify the premium.

Here’s a breakdown of Palantir’s streak:

Quarter	Stock Return (%)	Key Catalyst
Q4 2023	15	Initial AI platform traction
Q1 2024	12	Government contract wins
Q2 2024	18	U.S. commercial acceleration
Q3 2024	22	Earnings beat, raised guidance
Q4 2024	14	Expanded enterprise deals
Q1 2025	16	Profit growth inflection
Q2 2025	25	93% U.S. rev surge

This table matches the chart’s upward trajectory, highlighting PLTR’s consistency amid volatility. For global audiences, Palantir’s edge lies in its ontology-driven AI—policy enablers for secure data fusion in defense and healthcare.

Charting the Course: Jab, Don’t Uppercut

In this AI octagon, Oracle’s a middleweight stepping up—trim to dodge jabs, but don’t count it out. Palantir’s the heavyweight: Hold for the long haul, sized small. Bubbles? Look to the fringes, not the champs. Business leaders: Allocate 5-10% to AI pure-plays, diversified. Policymakers: Foster infrastructure growth while curbing speculative excess.

As markets extremes blend 1997 innovation with 1999 hype, the data whispers: Earnings endure. Oracle may dip to $175; Palantir could double again. But in investing, as Baruch says, “take a jab from time to time.” Your portfolio will thank you.